Sunday, November 15, 2015

Modern Educayshun

I was just today introduced into this brilliant satirical masterpiece criticizing the mindset of social justice warriors and the future of education, considering the recent trend of "safe spaces".

Friday, November 13, 2015

White men account for 70% of suicides in USA: racist black women rejoice

On Lipstick Alley, a website by black women (just kidding, look up who owns that site) for black women, there is a new hot thread titled White men account for 70% of suicides in USA. Predictably, despite their own assertions that black people can not be racist, as indicated in a previous post of mine and as evident in the comments on a recent controversial YouTube video where "Safe space" students silence an Asian lady for saying "black people can be racist", this gets a lot of upvotes, a lot of laughs and the comments in that threat are a textbook example of the most vile racist statements ever:

  • User La Boheme seizes the opportunity to make this about "white privilege": I think White male privilege has a lot to do with it. When faced with slight adversities, many white men can't deal because they're not used to it.
  • User PiscesPrincess3 claims (and gets lots of upvotes and laughs): I wish I gave a damn.
  • User Princess Tiana claims: *insert gif of Viola Davis giggling in The Help*
  • User karyn claims: The rate can't be that significant. I still see them strolling about.
  • User Selamism gets a lot of downvotes for being sensible: Some people are actually laughing about suicide? Come on!
  • User Bill Cipher claims: This statistic is born completely out of privilege and I don't feel bad
  • User O Bryan claims: So what's the problem?
  • User Basic 101 also gets a lot of downvotes for: Some of these folks on LSA can be some indignant mother******! Suicide is NO laughable matter
  • User Meenah claims: A lot of them don't know how to cope if someone isn't coddling, kissing their ass, or making everything go their way.
  • User Soca Priestess claims: Are people really in their feelings because some of us have no fucks to give these privileged, psychopathic terrorists? 
What can we learn from all this? 

1. That all the white people who hate themselves over their "white privilege", some of whom can be seen in the video below, should take the next step in appeasing black people and kill themselves.
2. Black people can not be racist, even if they wish the death of all white people, they can only be bigoted. Remember, racism is bigotry plus power structures. A social justice warrior told me so.

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Germaine Greer says transgender "women" are not real women

This nevertheless quite obvious fact is cause for outrage and an article on Jezebel. This is causing (mainly white) feminists to have a heart attack and resort to their usual tactics of suppression of thought crimes by wishing to ban her from speaking on campuses and to destroy her career. It is also not surprising to those that know 'social justice warriors' how many of these hypocrite people are resorting to ageism and are saying Greer ought to shut up with her 20th century opinions.

Considering Greer's views on female genital mutilation ( ) , one should however not be particularly sad and radical feminists tearing their own to shreds is a rather amusing spectacle to behold.

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Kara Brown says Matt Damon mad at Effie Brown

Today at Jezebel, there is an utter crap article titled "Matt Damon Is Mad at Effie Brown Over That Diversity Conversation on Project Greenlight" by Kara Brown. Now, a short introduction: why is Jezebel (still) mad at Matt Damon and why is the whole internet basically calling Matt Damon a racist? Did he lynch a black person? Call a black person the n-word? No, far worse. Matt Damon actually committed the hate crime of daring to disagree with AND interrupt a black woman. That bad.

This has led to massive outrage on the internet and has been used as an excuse to hate on white men, using meaningless terms as "whitesplaining", "white privilege" and most funnily saying "white liberals are the worst". In reality, Matt Damon is an all round good egg, socially committed and it makes you wonder whether those people actually believe the utter nonsense coming out of their mouth as they cannot possibly like actual white conservatives more.

Anyway, enough about Matt Damon. Time for a word on Kara Brown. Who is Kara Brown? Kara Brown is the resident racist black female troll writer for Jezebel, who fills her days writing mostly about irrelevant stories, to receive praise by sick sycophants while all dissenting commentators are banned by her. Her racism may be hard to notice as it is interspersed by the massive amount of irrelevant stuff she writes about. Once in a while however, in comments to other people or in her articles on controversial white people like Iggy Azalea (white women shouldn't rap), Taylor Swift (white women shouldn't be as popular as Beyoncé) and Christopher Columbus (white men shouldn't kill native Americans, they really shouldn't), you can really see the underlying hatred for all white people burning in her dark heart.

Racist woman in need of better hair
In her pathetic attempt to extend Jezebel's two minute hate session against Matt Damon, she claims now that Matt Damon is "mad" at Effie Brown, citing this article. Unfortunately it appears in said article, Effie Brown claimed her relationship with Marc Joubert, not Matt Damon, is in “tatters. We get it Kara Brown, Marc Joubert, Matt Damon, all white people's names sound alike. It's like Sha'niqua, Sharkeisha or Watermelondrea to one of those racist white liberals.

Kara Brown seems to have followed journalism classes from her colleague Anna Merlan, as apparently:
Brown now says, “Word on the street is I’m not his favorite person.”
word on the street is a valid source for a journalist. If you are wondering why Kara Brown isn't fired at Jezebel, I don't know. She even hates other white feminists, as evidenced in this Jezebel item. White female Jezebel readers just seem too dumb to realize they're hated on and think they're special because they feel white guilt and cheer along with black female Jezebel readers on how bad white feminists are. Three cheers for intersectionality.

Anyway, what can we learn from all this? Matt Damon is a white liberal, you know, the worst kind of racist. I suggest he works on his image, real hard.

Try harder to be black, Matt Damon 

Saturday, October 10, 2015

Movie "The Martian" actually appears to be blackwashed

Apparently it isn't bad enough that Jezebel poorly reported on a party that supposedly had white people wearing "blackface" (actually dressed as gold digger), now their outrage boner has reached new levels of priapism. In a new article on Jezebel, it is claimed the movie The Martian featuring Matt Damon is whitewashed.

In Ridley Scott’s The Martian, Mackenzie Davis (a white actress) plays scientist Mindy Park, who’s Korean-American in the book from which the film is adapted, while Chiwetel Ejiofor (a black actor) plays a NASA director whose original character is Asian Indian.

In actuality, while Park is a common South Korean name, it is also a western name and no where in the book the ethnicity of the character is mentioned. So actually, the only complaint that can be made for real is that this movie has been blackwashed.

But I guess Jezebel just finds it fancy to distort the truth in order to turn their two minute hate session against Matt Damon into a four minute hate session. Because while in the old days, they rightly called you racist for the actual crime of lynching black people, nowadays interrupting a black person is enough to be accused of the thought crime of racism.

Thursday, October 8, 2015

Anna Merlan thinks being dressed as a gold digger is "blackface"

Today on both Gawker and Jezebel, a story on a UCLA student groups throwing a “Kanye Western” themed party, for which guests dressed in baggy clothes, plumped lips and padded bottoms, or as “Kardashians.”

Oh boy, Kanye West. He's black, so you know people are butthurt in advance and looking for an excuse to be offended. Lo and behold, the Afrikan Student Union claims to be offended. Leftwing Gawker is remarkedly even handed, radical leftwing feminist Jezebel went completely overboard and did not bother to even check facts. There only a single photo was posted and the blackface was left to the imagination of the readers. Not surprisingly, this story is covered by Anna Merlan, a self proclaimed "real" journalist who got her white face burned pretty badly on the UVA rape story.

As pointed out at Gawker, none of the photos really show people in blackface:

Drawn on goatee and charcoal on the face now constitute "blackface"
Armenians should be offended. They don't all have big butts.

As remarked by a commentator on Gawker: it's frustrating, when you want to judge, you need to judge, you are dying to judge, but you just can't find a good reason. Jezebel likes to have an outrage boner. Here's how a real gold digger looks like by the way:

One of the first results for Google image and "gold miner": a racist chap wearing blackface.

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Texas woman gets textbook publisher to alter supposedly "racist" caption

Educational publisher McGraw-Hill is updating one of their textbooks after a Texas-based mother and teacher publicly complained about a page that refers to slaves as “workers.”

The offending image

The whiner's post

This is featured all over the news, even CNN, and is also the subject of a post on Jezebel, titled Texas Mom Forces Textbook Publisher to Correct Caption Implying Slaves Were Immigrant Workers. This title contains three errors:

  1. The publisher wasn't forced but voluntarily agreed to "do better" given sensitivities.
  2. The caption is not being corrected, slaves were not entitled to benefits and had to work.
  3. The caption did not imply slaves were immigrant workers, since it starts with "The Atlantic Slave Trade", making quite clear people were working as slaves.
The problem is many people of color still walk around with an imaginary slave collar around their neck, thinking they've only been freed yesterday. This whole outrage is manufactured and an excuse to bash white people for perceived racism. I won't deny real racism exists, but this is no such example. The book is poorly formulated and doesn't mention enough that some of the migration was forced and the publisher seems to agree and will correct.

Friday, September 18, 2015

Black people can't be racist

Or so I have been told already numerous times by people who believe the nonsense they read on places like Gawker, Jezebel and other blogs and social media accounts of social justice warriors. But is this really true? Let's have a look at the dictionary definition first:

Dictionary definition

Let's look first at the Oxford Dictionaries definition of racism:
Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior:
The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races
From the dictionary definition alone, it seems that there is nothing that precludes black people from being or acting racist. This has not prevented all kind of social justice warriors to come up with various redefinitions of the term, redefinitions specifically tailored to suit their agenda. Some are living in denial of the basic fact that they are redefining the definition, some are not.

Redefinition fail #1

One of the more hilarious discussions I have had with a person claiming black people can not be racist, revolved around the following tenet: black people can not be racist because they are the minority. There are two things wrong with this:

  1. black people are the majority in some countries and have performed their own ethnic cleansing, think for example Idi Amin and the expulsion of Asians from Uganda.
  2. according to that definition, the white minority of South Africa under Apartheid was not racist.

These people could NOT have been racist due to being a minority, or so I've been told
This led the person to revise his own definition to one that is more in line with one used by social justice warriors and that does not use the distinction majority/minority. Let's look at two of these more common redefinitions.

Redefinition fail #2

A somewhat more clever redefinition (sometimes social justice warriors admit they change the dictionary definition, claiming it is wrong) of racism introduces the element of institutional power. The argument goes that white people enjoy a preferential treatment by institutions like the police and the justice system. Let's have a look at an example at a social justice warrior's Tumblr:

no, they cannot. there is an inherent logical fallacy in your argument that will never make it true. however, white people can be discrimated against. discrimination is different from racism.
let’s start from the beginning. your first step is to accept that “a hatred or intolerance of another race” is not the definition of racism. the dictionary is wrong. get over it.
racism is when intolerance in government laws, attitudes and ideals of a society are ingrained in a culture to the point where patterns of discrimination towards a certain race are institutionalized as normal. if you keep this in mind, you’ll understand that reverse racism doesn’t- and can’t- exist.
There is an element of truth in this. Black people are getting harsher sentences than white people for similar crimes and there seems to be a difference in the number of cases of police brutality when it concerns white or black offenders. A correction however does need to be applied due to other reasons: it seems reasonable to assume white people can afford a better defense lawyer for example and the number of black criminals is often higher than the number of white criminals, adjusting for racial make up that is.

The biggest problem with this redefinition is that "patterns of discrimination towards a certain race" by government and other institutions are actually outlawed in many countries including the US (14th Amendment to be specific). As a matter of fact, despite this, the only real institutionalized race based actions that are (pseudo) legal these days are affirmative action programs. When you point this blatant hypocrisy out to social justice warriors, they will say that these kind of programs only level the playing field (if they are nice) or that white people are given a taste of their own medicine and merely complain of losing their "privilege" (if they are not nice, usually the latter). Often accompanied with GIFs such as the world's tiniest violin or image variations of white tears.

Nice GIF though
Nevertheless, the point remains that institutionalized racism hardly exists and there are only minor arguments pro and contra this point. On top of that, it is most likely that even in a future where white people become a minority and these very institutions will be majority non white populated, white people will still have lower sentences for similar crimes and lower amount of police brutality due to previously mentioned reasons. As such, this redefinition is a fail.

Redefinition fail #3

Another more clever redefinition of racism introduces the element of power dynamics in general:

there is another saying “racism (or sexism) = prejudice + power. poc (people of color) can be prejudiced against white people. but they can never have power, i.e. a whole system of structured support that backs them. white people often don’t understand how much power they have. just one white person has more power to do actual harm to a black person than one hundred black people do to that white person. a white person can kill a black person without any consequences, while if the situation was reversed you can bet the killer wouldn’t see the outside of a prison cell for a long, long time.
when white people complain about reverse racism, they are not complaining about losing their rights. what they are complaining about is losing their privilege. white people can never call someone else racist against them because that ‘someone else’ does not have the power to oppress them. the person has the power to be hurt feelings.but not to oppress.
that is the key difference. when a poc is mean to you, they are just being mean to you. their entire society is not actively discriminating against and oppressing you. their society is not one where it is difficult for them to not be racist against you.
This definition is again arbitrary and shows a staggering amount of victimhood and persecution complex. White people can't just shoot black people on the street anyhow without consequences, this is an oversimplification and a gross exaggeration. At most white police officers have a chance of getting away with this when independent cameras are not around. Black people can hold positions of power and can discriminate against white subordinates. Black people are routinely calling e.g. Latino bosses that discriminate against black subordinates racist, yet Latinos don't have magical "power structures" watching over them. And when a group of black people gang up on one or two white people, I wonder why these white people never use their mythical powers in self defense.

Racist white guy uses his powers of oppression to discriminate against a black man's foot

A nice video explaining this

Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet made a nice video on this topic when MTV aired their version of the "Black people can't be racist" trope. You should really check it out, he can be quite funny and really point out the bullshit.

God DOES hate fags

And fags too bitches.
Now let's get something clear from the start: as an atheist I have an issue with religion, not with homosexuality.

That being said, I also have an issue with people getting upset when some Christians (labeled "bible thumpers", "bible bashers", "christian fundamentalists") dare to utter the notion that God hates fags. Does God really hate fags? Let's see:

Old Testament

Lev 18:22 You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act.
Lev 20:13 If a man has sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman, the two of them have committed an abomination. They must be put to death; their blood guilt is on themselves.
Some will cite Sodom and Gomorrah stuff, but that never explicitly detailed homosexuality. So it is quite clear that God declares homosexuality as a disgusting act, an abomination punishable by DEATH.

Jehova, God and Allah ALL approve killing gay men

New Testament

Now wait a minute, "christians" who are tolerant about homosexuality will say: Jesus is all about forgiveness and a "love thy neighbor", "hate the sin, not the sinner" kind of guy. While true, Jesus would still have thought of homosexuality as a sin, considering: Matthew 5:17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them". This means exactly what it says and means that Leviticus is still relevant. Now some may argue with stuff like: yeah, but that pork eating stuff changed. Well sure it changed, more proof your religion sucks and contains internal contradictions. It doesn't prove your best imaginary buddy God magically became okay with homosexuality.

While Jesus indeed said nothing explicitly about homosexuality, let's see what is otherwise relevant in the New Testament about homosexuality:

Rom 1:24-32 (24) Therefore God gave them over in the desires of their hearts to impurity, to dishonor their bodies among themselves. (25) They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and worshiped and served the creation rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. (26) For this reason God gave them over to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged the natural sexual relations for unnatural ones, (27) and likewise the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed in their passions for one another. Men committed shameless acts with men and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. (28) And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what should not be done. (29) They are filled with every kind of unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, malice. They are rife with envy, murder, strife, deceit, hostility. They are gossips, (30) slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, contrivers of all sorts of evil, disobedient to parents, (31) senseless, covenant-breakers, heartless, ruthless. (32) Although they fully know God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but also approve of those who practice them. 
1 Cor. 6:9-11 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual partners, practicing homosexuals, (10) thieves, the greedy, drunkards, the verbally abusive, and swindlers will not inherit the kingdom of God. (11) Some of you once lived this way. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. 
1 Tim. 1:8-15 But we know that the law is good if someone uses it legitimately, (9) realizing that law is not intended for a righteous person, but for lawless and rebellious people, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, (10) sexually immoral people, practicing homosexuals, kidnappers, liars, perjurers — in fact, for any who live contrary to sound teaching. (11) This accords with the glorious gospel of the blessed God that was entrusted to me. (12) I am grateful to the one who has strengthened me, Christ Jesus our Lord, because he considered me faithful in putting me into ministry, (13) even though I was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor, and an arrogant man. But I was treated with mercy because I acted ignorantly in unbelief, (14) and our Lord’s grace was abundant, bringing faith and love in Christ Jesus. (15) This saying is trustworthy and deserves full acceptance: “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” — and I am the worst of them!
Yup: after Jesus came along, homosexuality is still a sin, gays still deserve to die and still will not inherit the kingdom of God. Calling people bible thumpers, bible bashers and christian fundamentalists does NOT change the truth, which is that:

  1. the christian imaginary sky fairy very much hates gay people
  2. the "christians" who do not think homosexuality is a sin deserving of death, are total hypocrites.

Recommended deity for the LGBT crowd rejecting atheism 

Monday, September 7, 2015

LSA and white parents adopting black children

I recently had an item on Jezebel and their covering of a white woman who sued a sperm bank for mistakenly giving her sperm of a black donor. The overwhelming and predictable response is that the woman was a racist and a horrible human being. Apparently it should come as normal to this woman to have a baby of ANY color and racial issues should be non existent.

But how do black women REALLY feel about this when they think white people are not reading along like on Jezebel? We can get a clue by reading the following thread on Lipstick Alley, a site by black women (just kidding, look up who owns that site) for black women, entitled: Why are SOME of you against white people adopting Black kids?.

The opinion on white people raising black children is overwhelmingly negative. Reasons are:
  • User msthaaaang claims: Because they cannot teach/warn them of the black experience seeing as they have no idea what it means it feels like to be black.
  • User Genesislinx claims: Cuz a lot of them have inherent prejudices and ignorance about black people that they pass on to their adopted children. Some of them also twisted ideas and perversions regarding black folks and people of color in general.
  • User RomanticRights claims: I'm not against it but i don't think it's ideal unless the white parents are fully aware of the black experience which it is a rarity.
  • User gesamtkunsTWERK  has the retarded opinion (some mixed race kids are named Kieran, a name chosen together by both parents): Because non-black people treat black children like a hot commodity and bring these children into hella racist families without blinking an eye. Just look at Romney's grandson. You can't tell me that family isn't anti-black as fuck. They named the child Kieran for goodness sake, which literally means "dark-skinned"/"black" in gaelic.
  •  User RUDE BOY claims: I honestly can't think of an answer because I'm 50/50 about it. While I think a child should be adopted by two loving parents regardless of their race, I also wonder about their upbringing in the sense that they may be completely white-washed from their own culture.
  • User Zephyr claims white people treat black children like pets: Because ive witnessed the abuse that non white children go through that are adopted by well off white families. White peoples treat non white children like puppies from the dog pound , they feel like they are doing the kids a favour by giving them a new home. I have a friend who was adopted by a rich white man as a gift to his wife. They are trulely sick, children are not pets or inanimate objects to be given as gifts!
  • User Baker Dandridge claims: I'm not againts whitee adopting black kids per se but I think the race issue is there whether we like it or not and some of the parents can be naive about this. They should be versed on racism and make a conscious effort to help their child navigate their black identity.
Now which comment actually got the most downvotes on Lipstick Alley? Surprise, surprise, that would be the comment that elaborates on Jezebel's hippie kumbaya message of "all you need for a child is love":
  • User texaco claims: This isn't rocket science folks. In order to raise a child into a reasonably well-adjusted adult. All you need is love. Now as for cultural development and all that super critical shit. There are options out there to get that done.
What can we learn from all of this? Women of all races on a forum like Jezebel will say all you need for a child is love and white parents raising a black child is no problem at all. Black women however, when thinking white people are not watching, will say a completely different thing in private (I think white women in private also don't believe their own politically correct hypocrite bullshit). Black women overwhelmingly side eye white parents raising a black child and think it either is a problem (up to "they'll be treated like pets") or might be a problem if the child doesn't get the "black experience". I don't know what exactly the latter means or what "feeling black" means, but I believe the child should be taught about victim-hood and racism. The white parents should tell the child of all the evils of white people.

As you can see, hypocrisy aplenty.

Refugee crisis nearing an end

Pope calls on every European parish to host one migrant family each - Yahoo News. Surely, if this request gets followed up by all the christian folks in Europe, the refugee crisis will be solved. Considering the number of Christians in Europe, all 23 million or so Syrians would easily find a new, safe home.

So far, the pope has decided to lead by example and commit to housing a grand total of two families underneath the gold plated ceilings of the Vatican. The end is in sight people.

Other religions are even more committed to solving this crisis: Saudi Arabia - self proclaimed guardian of Islam and keeper of the holiest sites - and neighboring Gulf States, are committing to housing zero refugees. The following illustration is doing the rounds in the media:

Spot the missing Syria neighbor. Where is Waldo Schlomo?

Curiously, the websites using this illustration make no mention whatsoever that the only (comparatively) safe country, DIRECTLY neighbouring Syria and the only real democracy in the Middle East, has also refused to take up Syrian refugees. I wonder why?

As an atheist, I am hugely impressed by the contributions that states proclaiming to be the guardians of their monotheistic religions (Vatican City: christianity, Saudi Arabia: islam, Israel: judaism) have made to solving this crisis. Really.

Thursday, September 3, 2015

LSA on the hardship of friendship with white women

A short intro: Lipstick Alley is a website by black women for black women (just kidding, look up who owns that site). Today on LSA we can find a new gem of a thread titled "Does anyone else find it hard to be friends with yt women?". In case any guilt ridden white women, the kind of which is abundant on Jezebel, wanted to find out how their black "friends" view their "friendship", now is the time. The original post by user Miso Horny (creative name) goes as follows:

In my experience I feel that it is more trouble than what it's worth. Sometimes they seem out of touch, moody and not straight forward. It's like dealing with a weasel. 

I dont know know how to explain it, but I also feel less comfortable around them, in a sense that they are kind of corny. (NOT ALL. I mean my celeb baes can get it, but there men...and while some are like above I dont think men in general tend to have those bitch ass qualities. The women also seem jealousy and think they should be the center of attention. Especially the blondes. It's like s blonde walks in and she just assumes her blonde self will be number one, but our society glorifies blondes even the most basic.

hmm maybe I'm just venting and over reacting, but damn...I need more colored ppl WOMEN to talk to in real life.

Allow me to select but a few posts among the replies below. This is again not picking a few exceptions, these statements are the norm:

  • User baqardi posted this universally approved post, that might as well summarize general feelings: I have trouble being friends with white people period
  • User Zaila posted another universally approved postI don't have white friends. Like not even one lol.
  • User Beaming1  posted following mostly approved gem : Hate white bitches. With a passion.
  • User Mrs Cam Newton  posted the following, which got plenty of downvotes: I have white friends. Befriending them was as natural as befriending my other friends. Sometimes I have a hard time befriending black people because I'm an "Oreo". It really just depends on the person for me. My circle is really diverse, and I like it that way.
  • User Bella Rose  on thieving white people: I had a few. There was one that was Single White Femaleish. She would copy EVERYTHING I did. The way I dressed, my hair, make up, jewelry, etc.

    I called her out on it and she was like, "You inspire me." I was like hmm, I guess we "inspire" all white people, because y'all stay stealing from us....She didn't have anything to say, lol
  • User bigshirley posted the following apparently very funny (lots of laughs, haha) post: i don't even like white dogs
  • User Grl got plenty of downvotes for : Y'all are a sad bunch. When I hear stuff like this it makes me grateful for my diverse upbringing. If anything, I have a harder time befriending other black girls, not because I don't want to. It's just harder. All white women (people) are not the same. Yes, they can be corny, annoying, vapid, etc. but then there are a lot black women that for every stereotype in the book too.
  • User Wednesday A on white womenz trying to steal her man: Every white woman friend I had turned out to be a back stabbing bish. I was completely done when my old 'best' friend tried to fuck my ex and flirted with him in high school. She ruined all white girls for me now. I haven't tried to befriend a white girl since. They don't try to talk to me. And I don't try to talk to them. It's better this way xD ...
  • User ih1990 gets a lot of laughs with : i don't have any white friends lol i live in a part of canada that is chock full of white people too lol. i'd rather be by myself 24/7 than be friends with white people. people always get surprised when they find this out tho b/c i guess i come off as a new black until i inevitably start talking about how much white people suck
  • User Warhorse gets a lot of downvotes (black people can't be racist you know) : Have you ever considered that you might be racist? Not judging. Just wondering.
  • User Never A Flaw , accurately describing herself as intolerant (self knowledge is great): no. cuz i don't try.
  • User Crooklyn It's hard to be friends with yts period.. Can't trust them

What can we learn from all this? That people often look for friendships in their own communities. This is not necessarily bad or evidence of racism (except when it concerns white people, everything is proof of their racism), it is kind of natural for all races and nationalities. We do see blatant racism when people say they "hate white bitches with a passion". So again, yes black people can be racist too, which is an unpopular opinion as evidenced above.

If you are a guilt ridden white woman that hangs around Jezebel, you might want to reevaluate how your black friends view you and whether you are a close friend or more of an acquaintance. You may also have to double your efforts to be "woke", whatever that means (acknowledging your "white privilege", how black people are so disadvantaged, repeat the bad history of white people ad nauseam, yada yada yada). When it comes to race relationships, keep in mind that while everybody dancing in a circle singing kumbaya is great, reality is different and it is not only white people who are at fault for the differences between utopia and reality.

LSA on black men with white women (2): black woman seeking "chocolate children" with white man (how?)

A short intro: Lipstick Alley is a website by black women for black women (just kidding, look up who owns that site). In a simplified fashion, one might summarize that the site is filled with black women, 60% of whom think that "white peen" (term used over there) is the grossest thing ever and the other 40% of whom is "down with the swirl" (same), except when it concerns black men dating so called "Becky's" (generic name for white women, but don't you ever dare refer to black women as "Sharkeesha's").

Now while black people of the "social activist kind" will tell you that black people can not be racist because they are not the majority or don't "have power structures", one can clearly observe themes that also recur on sites like Stormfront (just interchange the terms "black" and "white"):
  • race mixing is bad
  • white people are evil
  • hanging around white people and promoting black causes are mutually exclusive
Now if this post sounds familiar so far, it is: so far these are exactly the same points as made in a previous post about James Earl Jones. That thread so far has 20+ pages, a high number over there but quite usual giving the subject matter. The topic is an easy way to get your threads viewed, drive up your posts and popularity, so it comes as no surprise that there is an additional thread called "Why do black people, particularly black men procreate with white people? Serious discussion". Allow me to quote the original post, by user The Love Below :

It seems like black people are the #1 race that doesn't preserve [black] legacies. Of course there are some but I see so many wealthy or famous black men who have white wives or other race wives with no second thought. It's so odd to me. I don't usually see black women go out of the way to marry white men. I honestly think black women are more mindful to wanting black husbands/fathers for their kids but these black men. I swear, shit is getting worse now. We need to start being smart. I always say I'm going to marry a black man and I want the father of my kids to be BLACK. I want a BLACK empire. BLACK legacy. That's the way it should be. Why don't we teach these kind of things? 

There's no need to whitewash bloodlines. That's what they want you to do. Rich black people should keep their bloodline BLACK. Why have a biracial child who doesn't look black and has white blood and then they have kids with less black blood. I can't. We need to be smarter.

Now while in the thread on James Earl Jones, we saw that clearly the vast majority of the audience disapproved of interracial relationships, this thread has managed to attract a slightly more even audience of  what can only be described as black supremacists versus swirlers or those who do not mind as much. Black supremacists are still the majority though. Now I will not give a summary of posts like in the James Earl Jones thread as it is the usual vile bunch of statements for black supremacy and against interracial relationships, although this time interspersed with more statements from mentally saner people.

I want to draw attention instead to one of the more delusional posts, by user TabithaNow the excuse of a number of white people that they cannot be racist because they have a token black friend, or even a couple of black friends, is well known. It is well known because it is ostensibly false: you can have black friends and still be racist. Less well known is that there is an equivalent when it comes to racism from the black community: "I have a white friend". The quote below is however taking this a bit more to the extreme: to have a white husband and still hate children's whiteness, claim white DNA as inferior and claim to be "woke". I'll let the statement speak for itself:

I love my husband (who is white), but I wasn't woke when I married him. Now, I do not desire mixed children at all. I want my future children to be chocolate and proud like me. I don't want them confused about their blackness. I want them to have the best DNA sequencing and natural protection against aging and the effects of the sun.
 Now "social activist" types will tell you black people can not be racist because they are not the majority and/or they do not have "power structures created for systemic oppression", but fuck them. This isn't "bigotry", this is racism pure and simple. For those wondering why I care, as mentioned before, I have mixed children. I don't want them to see themselves as either "white" or "black" because they're not. I want them to see themselves differently and as their own persons, thinking with their own mind instead of listening to the hive mind when it comes to interracial relationships.

What can we learn from all this? If a black person says they can't be racist because they have a white friend or are married to a white person, do NOT take them on their word either.

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

LSA on black men with white women (1): James Earl Jones edition

A short intro: Lipstick Alley is a website by black women for black women (just kidding, look up who owns that site). In a simplified fashion, one might summarize that the site is filled with black women, 60% of whom think that "white peen" (term used over there) is the grossest thing ever and the other 40% of whom is "down with the swirl" (same), except when it concerns black men dating so called "Becky's" (generic name for white women, but don't you ever dare refer to black women as "Sharkeesha's").

Now while black people of the "social activist kind" will tell you that black people can not be racist because they are not the majority or don't "have power structures", one can clearly observe themes that also recur on sites like Stormfront (just interchange the terms "black" and "white"):

  • race mixing is bad
  • white people are evil
  • hanging around white people and promoting black causes are mutually exclusive

It comes hence as no surprise that James Earl Jones having a white wife is a new hot thread on Lipstick Alley. Allow me to select but a few posts:

  • User TheProfaneAngel : Jeez...his son is basically white. So one of the greatest black actors of all time black legacy will be gone if his son choose to marry white. Wtf? Don't these black men think? Jeez...
  • User TheProfaneAngel : You can't be pro black and marry white in my opinion. They did their part for civil rights but they weren't pro black to me. Pro black people value black families.
  • User Freespirit123 (the irony): Hi The Flavor. You just got the memo? That's all that James marries is White women. This is his second Becky wife.

    Back in the day, my parents expressed how baffled they were that James was always talking the pro Black nationalist talk against racism towards Black people, yet he was always with White women. We (me and my parents) still love and admire the brother, but we just wondered about this.
  • User sugarbaby1 : Look how white and unattractive their sons are.
  • User ElizabethTheII : that's unfortunate
  • User The Flavor Yes....same with Harry Belafonte and Sidney Poitier. Pro black but married white. 
  • User ZeeZeeblue : That's typical behavior when it comes to a lot of those pro black men. I read that the majority of the guys who were in the Black Panther Party were screwing white chicks.
  • User ZeeZeeblue : They don't care. A lot of these black men are so full of self-hate until having a white woman and half white children is the only thing that makes them feel good about themselves.
  • User Frozenyoghurt : They weren't interested in fighting for equal rights for black people, they were interested in equal rights for themselves. Namely, access to white women lol.

    They weren't really about dismantling white supremacy. They just wanted white acceptance.
  • User Butterflyj30 : He's married to a white woman 
  • User HighfivesuckJames bred the black right out of his line
  • User heyladies : this really hurts my feelings
    and I concur with the men are so disappointing man, like fuck, get it together.

Now I get people coming: 

  • you're coming from a racist angle: my angle is I have mixed children, I have issues with people decrying the evils of race mixing.
  • you're selectively quoting: no I'm not, those comments are the majority, check for yourself.
  • those comments aren't approved there: again, check for yourself. Nearly no one challenges these greatly approved views.

One of the few comments that got downvotes was the one telling the truth about the hypocrisy inherent on that site:

  • User Dre22Era : black man get a white woman = he is a sellout
    black women get a white man = you go girl get that money

What can we learn from all this? For many black women, race mixing of black men with white women is evil.

For women coming from Jezebel: one of these days I'll post an article of how much people at Lipstick Alley look down upon "white feminists at Jezebel". You can choose to dismiss me and continue with your white guilt parade, or you can face reality one of these days and learn what LSA'ers truly think about you, yes, even if you acknowledge your "guilt".